Copy to
Tientsin,
Amoy,
Shanghai,
BRITTSH LEGATION PEKING.
1st. November 1932.
64
Diplomatic Mission.
(4/53H/1932)
My dear Maze,
Two cases have recently occurred in which British
interests have come into conflict with the Customs and in
which we feel we have serious grounds for criticising the
action taken by the Customs. No doubt the facts are known
to you.
The first case is that of the s.s. "Ting Sang",
where a fine of Taels 1,000 was imposed by the Commissioner
of Customs at Tientsin on account of opium having been found
in the ship's bunkers. When the Company protested against
the imposition of this fine on the ground that they were not
a party to the attempted smuggling of the opium nor had com-
mitted any offence against the Customs Regulations, the Com-
missioner replied by calling their attention to their Annual
Guarantee which he said bound them to take steps to prevent
contraband from being taken aboard the vessels for which they
were agents.
Now this interpretation of the steamer companies'
annual guarantee is to say the least, open to question. The
relevant sections in the guarantee read:
"We also jointly and severally guarantee to remain
responsible to the Commissioner for and to pay him if
called upon to do so any fine to which the master of
any such steamer at any time may have become liable
here owing to the contravention of any treaty rule or
regulation in case we shall be unable within three months
from the time of the alleged contravention of the rule
Sir Frederick W. Maze, K.B.E..!
Inspector General,
Chinese Maritime Customs,
SHANGHA IM
For
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.